PB E-mail content delivery - eTOCs !
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (1995) 19: 129-134. doi: 10.1192/pb.19.3.129
© 1995 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whittaker, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Appleby, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Whittaker, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Appleby, L.

A psychiatric emergency walk-in clinic: a dangerous substitute for primary care?

Jane F. Whittaker, Registrar and Louis Appleby, Senior Lecturer

Department of Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, West Didsbury, Manchester M20 8LR

Data were collected on a six month sample of patients attending a psychiatric emergency walk-in clinic (n=378), based on the clinical impressions of the interviewing doctor. This information was then compared with a hypothetical model emergency service on the following five items: nature of patient problem, severity of problem, diagnosis, referring agent and current contact with psychiatric services. The severity of the perceived threat to the interviewer was recorded. Only 4.7% of referrals conformed to the hypothetical model on all five criteria. The majority of patients referred themselves, and the problems of self-referrals were significantly less severe than those of general practitioner referrals; 17.2% of consultations were perceived by the interviewing doctor as presenting a moderate or severe threat to his or her safety. The findings suggest that such an emergency facility operates as a form of primary care and is therefore inappropriately used. The level of perceived threat to interviewing doctors is unacceptably high.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1995 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.