PB College Seminars Series
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (1998) 22: 621-624. doi: 10.1192/pb.22.10.621
© 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wattis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wattis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Newton, P.

Old age psychiatrists' views on continuing in-patient care

John Wattis, Consultant/Senior Lecturer in Old Age Psychiatry*, Andrew Macdonald, Senior Registrar and Paul Newton, Clinical Audit Manager

Leeds Community and Mental Health NHS Trust, The Mansion, Meanwood Park Hospital, Tongue Lane, Leeds LS6 4QB

* Correspondence

Aims and methods The aim of this study was to elicit views from UK consultants in old age psychiatry concerning changes that were taking place in long-term care for older people with mental illness (especially dementia) and their views on a draft consensus statement produced by the Faculty for Psychiatry of Old Age on behalf of the College. A postal questionnaire was circulated as part of a wider survey of 472 consultants and a single postal reminder was sent to non-responders.

Results Two hundred and forty-two (51%) consultants responded. Nearly nine out of 10 respondents were in favour of continuing NHS consultant-supervised long-stay beds and three-quarters of them preferred a return to national numerical guidelines for bed numbers, though at a level approximately half of previous guidelines and provision. This was accompanied by a view that such beds should no longer be ‘for life’ with over three-quarters of respondents supporting discharge if, for example, behaviour problems resolved. if Government policy continued to support ‘eligibility criteria’ rather than guidelines, 60% were in favour of national rather than local criteria. There was very strong support for the draft consensus statement (now published in modified form as College Policy) and the ‘eligibility criteria’ it contained. Agreed criteria for waiting times in acute beds for continuing NHS, nursing home or residential care were not widely used.

Clinical implications Consultants want to continue to be responsible for some longer-term care and efforts should be made to develop the role of NHS longer-term care within the ‘spectrum of services’ provided for older people with psychiatric disorder, perhaps by acting as local ‘centres of excellence’ in dementia care as well as by providing services for patients with the more difficult behavioural problems. The more widespread use of ‘agreed waiting times’ for patients in acute beds requiring longer-term care should be explored.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.