PB Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (1998) 22: 677-680. doi: 10.1192/pb.22.11.677
© 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dickson-Mulinga, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dickson-Mulinga, J.

Rationale behind psychiatrists' choice of drug

John Dickson-Mulinga, Senior Registrar in Psychiatry

Withington Hospital, Nell Lane, West Didsbury, Manchester M20 8LR

Aims and method The study investigated the reasons that influence medical staffs' choice of a specific drug over another given the same clinical situation, by use of a questionnaire-based survey. The study population was 88 clinicians of various ranks, at psychiatry units in National Health Service university and district general hospitals in Greater Manchester. Responses in the factors: personal experience, scientific evidence, influence from colleagues, economic consideration, influence by drug representatives, ward or unit policy and other in choice of prescription, were the main outcome measures.

Results Of the 546 responses generated by the 88 clinicians, 263 (48.2%) were for personal experience as the most important influence on choice of prescription. Scientific evidence was the second most important factor with 117 (21.4%) responses. Economic consideration and influence by drug representatives were least important. This trend held for all ranks except for registrars, where scientific evidence was as important as personal experience.

Clinical implications As prescribers, clinicians trust mostly in their own personal experience. This may not be unique to psychiatrists. An understanding of how clinicians gain ‘personal experience’ could be important in improving rational prescribing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
S. Llewellyn-Jones and S. Cubbin
Enough of the sticks, what about some carrots?
Psychiatr. Bull., June 1, 2000; 24(6): 236 - 236.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.