PB Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (1999) 23: 463-466. doi: 10.1192/pb.23.8.463
© 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oyebode, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Paul, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oyebode, F.

Competence of voluntary psychiatric patients to give valid consent to neuroleptic medication*

Moli Paul, Senior Registrar in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry*

Parkview Clinic, 60 Queensbridge Road, Moseley, Birmingham B13 8QE;

Femi Oyebode, Medical Director

South Birmingham Mental Health NHS Trust, Vincent Drive, Birmingham B15 2TZ

* This paper formed part of the dissertation that won the Howard White Memorial Prize in 1998.

* Correspondence

Aims and method To ascertain the competence of voluntary psychiatric patients to consent to neuroleptic medication and whether there is a hierarchy of tests of competence. A prospective, observational study of consecutive, voluntary admissions to an acute ward using a questionnaire designed to test four levels of competence, the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Brief Symptom Inventory.

Results All subjects (n=40) could communicate a choice; 5% were competent at all levels. Tests were arbitrary and not hierarchical. Symptom relief/trust in doctors motivated most decisions to accept treatment.

Clinical implications The number and identity of individuals identified as competent will vary with the test set, and tests limited to cognitive criteria will not cover the complexity of the task.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
D. OKAI, G. OWEN, H. McGUIRE, S. SINGH, R. CHURCHILL, and M. HOTOPF
Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: Systematic review
The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 191(4): 291 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 1999 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.