|
|
|||||||||||
Division of Forensic Mental Health, Arnold Lodge, Cordelia Close, Leicester LE5 OLE
AIMS AND METHOD
A survey of 50 in-patient forensic health care and prison services in England, Wales and Scotland was employed to evaluate : (a) how severe personality disorder is assessed ; and (b) how assessments compare with recommendations concerning standardised assessment by the Working Group on Psychopathic Disorder (Reed, 1994).
RESULTS
Seventy per cent of services responded, of whom 40% formally assessed personality disorder. Fiftyfour instruments were routinely employed. Assessments of personality structure and cognitive/emotional styles were more common than structured diagnostic instruments or ratings of interpersonal functioning. Of the assessment tools, 25.7% of services provided at least one suggested by Reed (1994).
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
A nationally agreed, focused repertoire of instruments should be encouraged within secure forensic settings offering assessments to individuals with severe personality disorder.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Duggan, L. Mason, P. Banerjee, and J. Milton Value of standard personality assessments in informing clinical decision - making in a medium secure unit The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2007; 190(49): s15 - s19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |