PB RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 477-480. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.12.477
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lacey, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lacey, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, P.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 477-480
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


special articles

A survey of psychiatrists' and nurses' views of mental health advocacy

Yvonne Lacey, Medical Student

University of Leeds

Philip Thomas, Senior Research Fellow and Consultant Psychiatrist

Bradford Assertive Outreach Team, 48 Ashgrove, Bradford BD7 1BL

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD

Advocacy is assuming an increasingly important role in the delivery of mental health services, but many psychiatrists feel threatened by it. This study was performed to ascertain how much doctors and nurses know about advocacy and their attitudes towards it. We interviewed five senior house officers, five staff nurses and four community psychiatric nurses (CPNs) to examine their understanding, experience and opinions about advocacy. A full-time advocate was also interviewed to establish his views about how well staff understood his role.

RESULTS

In general there was poor understanding of the background and training of advocates, and their Code of Practice. There were also important differences in the way in which different groups of staff saw advocacy, with CPNs having the best understanding. Experiences of advocacy were positive and it was seen as being helpful both for clients and staff, despite fears that advocates might work to their ‘own agendas’.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

There is a need to improve psychiatrists' understanding of what advocacy is, through the involvement of advocates and service users in their training. This would help to allay their anxieties about the role of advocates.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
S. Samuels, I. Hall, C. Parkes, and A. Hassiotis
Professional staff and carers' views of an integrated mental health service for adults with learning disabilities
Psychiatr. Bull., January 1, 2007; 31(1): 13 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
P. Thomas
Good Psychiatric Practice 2000. Council Report CR83: By Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2002; 26(7): 278 - 278.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.