PB RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 296-299. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.8.296
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, A.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 296-299
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to a psychiatric intensive care unit in a medium secure unit

Mairead Dolan, MRCPsych, PhD

Edenfield Centre, Mental Health Services of Salford, Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester M25 3BL

Alan Lawson, BSc Mathematics, MSc Social Research, Formerly Researcher

Edenfield Centre, Prestwich Hospital

AIMS AND METHOD

There have been no reports on psychiatric intensive care units (PICUs) in medium secure psychiatric facilities. Using case files, we retrospectively examined the characteristics and outcomes of 73 patients who were admitted to a PICU in a medium secure unit between 1 July 1994 and 30 April 1998.

RESULTS

The PICU population was predominantly male, suffering from illness and detained under Part III of the Mental Health Act, 1983. Although the mean length of stay was 75 days, the majority were ultimately transferred to less intensive nursing environments and only nine required transfer to maximum security. In 10% of cases PICU admission was owing to lack of appropriate facilities elsewhere.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Although the PICU was intended as a crisis facility for the management of challenging behaviours, its function was affected by the lack of clear admission and discharge criteria and appropriate facilities for patients with diverse mental, physical and security needs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Soc PsychiatryHome page
L. Bowers, D. Jeffery, H. Bilgin, M. Jarrett, A. Simpson, and J. Jones
Psychiatric Intensive Care Units: a Literature Review
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, January 1, 2008; 54(1): 56 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
J. Glasby and H. Lester
On the Inside: A Narrative Review of Mental Health Inpatient Services
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2005; 35(6): 863 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.