PB College Seminars Series
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 83-86. doi: 10.1192/pb.28.3.83
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, J.
Right arrow Articles by Traill, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, J.
Right arrow Articles by Traill, B.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 83-86
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

What do consultants think about the development of specialist mental health teams?

Judy Harrison, Consultant psychiatrist and Barry Traill, Medical student

Manchester Mental Health & Social CareTrust, Chorlton House, 70 Manchester Road, Chorlton, Manchester.

AIMS AND METHOD

The UK Government is promoting three types of specialist team in psychiatry: assertive outreach, crisis resolution and early intervention in psychosis. Policy guidance suggests that psychiatrists be recruited to work exclusively within these teams, but little is known about the views of psychiatrists regarding their development. A postal survey was undertaken to seek the views of consultant psychiatrists in the North West.

RESULTS

Seventy per cent of psychiatrists responded to the questionnaire. Equal numbers agreed and disagreed with the development of specialist roles. Few services had been able to recruit to extra consultant sessions within the new teams and only a third of consultants believed the resources so far available to be reasonable. Overall views of the new teams were positive (mean scores 6.36, 6.51 and 6.03 on a 1-10 visual analogue scale for assertive outreach, crisis resolution and early onset psychosis teams). Consultants are particularly likely to believe that the new teams will increase patient satisfaction and provide a welcome change in role for some psychiatrists. A total of 64% of consultants believe that crisis resolution services could reduce hospital admissions, compared with 41% for assertive outreach and 31% for early onset psychosis teams. The concern most often voiced was that new services are being developed at the expense of existing teams.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Consultants perceive benefits associated with the new teams but are concerned about their impact on the rest of the organisation. If resource and recruitment issues can be addressed, consultants could prove to be supportive of these new models of service.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
J. Harrison
The work patterns of consultant psychiatrists: REVISITING... HOW CONSULTANTS MANAGE THEIR TIME
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., November 1, 2007; 13(6): 470 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
A. Blaj and K. Sirajudeen
In praise of crisis resolution and home treatment teams
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., September 1, 2007; 13(5): 392 - 392.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
J. Schneider, T. Brandon, D. Wooff, J. Carpenter, and R. Paxton
Assertive outreach: policy and reality
Psychiatr. Bull., March 1, 2006; 30(3): 89 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.