PB Handbook for Psychiatric Trainees
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 87-90. doi: 10.1192/pb.28.3.87
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, H.
Right arrow Articles by McConville, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ho, H.
Right arrow Articles by McConville, P.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 87-90
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Who’s happy with supervision?

Hilda Ho, Senior House Officer

South East Scotland Basic Specialist Training Scheme in Psychiatry. Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside Terrace, Edinburgh EH10 5HF

Pauline McConville, Consultant in General Adult Psychiatry and Educational Supervisor

Royal Edinburgh Hospital

Declaration of interest

None.

AIMS AND METHOD

All psychiatry trainees and supervisors on the Southeast Scotland scheme were invited to complete a questionnaire about the regularity, responsibility, structure, content and value of supervision.

RESULTS

Significantly more supervisors (87%) than trainees (69%) reported regular supervision. Some trainees still find it difficult to obtain regular supervision. Although it is seen as a joint responsibility, there is uncertainty about the role and responsibility of each trainee and supervisor. Most trainees and supervisors feel that supervision is useful, but supervisors are likely to rate their quality of supervision better than their trainees. Guidelines for the structure, content and boundaries of supervision might be useful. Supervision is viewed as useful for discussing clinical management, including the trainee’s own case-load.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Training in the use of supervision should be available to all trainees and supervisors. Regular supervision should be a priority, and it is a joint responsibility to ensure that it happens. There should be greater accountability to the College and Trusts. Discussion of the trainee’s clinical case-load during supervision is a necessary part of training and the supervision process.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.