|
|
|||||||||||
c/o Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, The Triangle, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford OX3 7XP
Department of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, University of Oxford on behalf of the Conference of Postgraduate Medical Deans of the United Kingdom
Correspondence: (tel: 01865 740605; fax: 01865 740604; e-mail: pgdean{at}oxford-pgmde.co.uk)
AIMS AND METHOD
The Record of In-Training Assessment grades of all registrars in the psychiatric specialties in the UK were analysed for each of three successive years, specialty by specialty, and compared with the average outcome for registrars in all disciplines over the same period.
RESULTS
Over 98% of psychiatry registrars were assessed as satisfactory, 1.2% needed targeted training and 0.7% were graded as unsatisfactory, requiring repeat training. Targeted training and repeat training led to a satisfactory outcome in the majority of cases.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
The process of assessment needs to become more objective, and should do so as the Royal Colleges develop better measures of clinical competence.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Naeem, J. Rutherford, and C. Kenn From specialist registrar to consultant: permission to land? Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2005; 29(9): 348 - 351. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |