PB College Seminars Series
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 171-173. doi: 10.1192/pb.28.5.171
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mujic, F.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mujic, F.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, M.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 171-173
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Comparison of liaison psychiatry service models for older patients

*Fedza Mujic

Staff Grade in Liaison Psychiatry for Older People

Charlotte Hanlon

Specialist Registrar in Psychiatry

Danny Sullivan

Specialist Registrar in Psychiatry

Gina Waters

Consultant Psychiatrist

Martin Prince

Consultant Psychiatrist and Professor of Psychiatric Epidemiology, Department of Psychological Medicine (King’s College Hospital), Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ

Declaration of interest

None.

AIMS AND METHOD

At a London teaching hospital, the existing off-site consultation model psychiatric liaison service for older people was replaced with an on-site liaison model service in December 2000. Several indicators of the functioning of the service were audited using identical methods before and after this change.

RESULTS

The case-load increased by 50%, but the liaison psychiatrists were more satisfied with the appropriateness of referrals. The case mix did not change. The new service achieved target waiting times more consistently, particularly for urgent referrals. Referring teams were more satisfied with the speed of response, while the new service maintained the salience and clarity of advice.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Findings are on the whole favourable, and support the wider introduction of specialist old-age liaison psychiatric services.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
D. Anderson, H. Cattell, and E. Bentley
Nurse-led liaison psychiatry service for older adults: service evaluation
Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2008; 32(8): 298 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
S. Ripley, S. Jones, and A. Macdonald
Capacity assessments on medical in-patients referred to social workers for care home placement
Psychiatr. Bull., February 1, 2008; 32(2): 56 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
M. Young and S. Morris
Higher training in liaison psychiatry for older adults: experiences of two specialist training posts
Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2007; 31(9): 354 - 356.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
P. Whelan, K. Lawson, and S. W. Burton
Service innovation: an old age liaison psychiatry service
Psychiatr. Bull., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 145 - 147.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.