|
|
|||||||||||
Newham Centre for Mental Health, Glen Road, London E13 8SP
Royal London Hospital, London
North East London Mental Health Trust, Ilford
AIMS AND METHOD
To examine and attempt to improve the recording of information within psychiatric discharge summaries in an adult psychiatry department, by means of audit and feedback. Psychiatric discharge summaries from an acute adult psychiatric department were examined to determine the recording of ten selected items. Following feedback and discussion, the audit was repeated after 6 months.
RESULTS
Fifty-one discharge summaries were examined on the first occasion and 53 on the second. There was considerable variability in the standard of recording across the selected items, but the patterns of recording were similar at both stages. No improvement was found in the recording of information at the second audit.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Audit and feedback alone may have little effect in changing clinical practice. This study examines the experience of undertaking clinical audit from a trainees perspective, illustrates barriers to change and highlights the possible limitations of audit as a clinical tool.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. G. Evans, C. d'Souza, P. Reynolds, C. Linton, L. Nukalapati, and A. Swarnkar Audit of availability and awareness of guidelines for the management of confusion in older patients on general wards Psychiatr. Bull., April 1, 2008; 32(4): 143 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |