PB College Seminars Series
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 416-418. doi: 10.1192/pb.29.11.416
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavrilovic, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Priebe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gavrilovic, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Priebe, S.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2005) 29: 416-418
© 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Survey of specialised UK traumatic stress services

Jelena Jankovic Gavrilovic

Academic Unit, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London E13 8SP, and Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, University of London, e-mail: j.jankovic{at}qmul.ac.uk

Patricia d’Ardenne

Institute of Psychotrauma, East London and the City Mental Health NHS Trust

Maria Bogic

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, University of London

Nicoletta Capuzzo

Institute of Psychotrauma, East London and the City Mental Health NHS Trust

Stefan Priebe

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, University of London and Institute of Psychotrauma, East London and the City Mental Health NHS Trust

AIMS AND METHOD

The aim of the survey was to establish the organisational structure and practice of specialised services for post-traumatic stress in the UK. Questionnaires were collected from 17 specialised trauma services across the UK.

RESULTS

Specialised trauma services use similar therapeutic programmes, but differ with respect to the characteristics of the treated clientele and organisational features. Although almost all services routinely measure outcome, some of the instruments used vary. There is no clear association between staff resources and number of patients treated.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Specialised traumatic stress services in the UK employ evidence-based treatment methods. A uniform protocol to measure outcome may help to establish a common UK-wide database on outcome of specialised treatment, and facilitate a reliable comparison between different service organisations and programmes. Organisational features should be considered to increase the efficiency of services.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.