|
|
|||||||||||
PO59, Institute of Psychiatry, DeCrespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, e-mail: r.uher{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk
South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, Crescent Resource Centre, Salcot Crescent, New Addington, CR0 0JJ
AIMS AND METHOD
To explore current practice in offering patients copies of correspondence, we audited the documentation of 422 patients of a community mental health team.
RESULTS
Discussion about copying letters was documented in 194 case notes (46%); older patients and those with medically unexplained physical symptoms were less likely to be offered copies. There were 159 patients (82%) that wanted to receive copies of letters; male gender was associated with declining this option. In 167 (87%) instances the professional completing the form was a psychiatrist.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Older patients need to be offered the opportunity to receive correspondence. Clinicians should record and substantiate their decision not to offer copies of letters to some patients. Professionals other than psychiatrists should be encouraged to discuss copying letters with patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Mason and D. Rice Does a business-like letter written for a general practitioner meet the standards for patients? Psychiatr. Bull., July 1, 2008; 32(7): 259 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |