|
|
|||||||||||
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF
|
|
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Very little research has been undertaken to characterise the service user groups served by the voluntary sector mental health services in Britain. In view of the high reported cases of dissatisfaction with the statutory mental health services in the population of Caribbean origin in Britain, we sought to compare the male service users attending a voluntary sector service in Brixton, South London with those attending a service run by the mental health hospital for that catchment area.
The service users and their case workers were interviewed and their case notes reviewed to obtain demographic information such as employment and forensic history and contact with other services. They were also assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN).
RESULTS
The service users attending the voluntary sector were significantly more disadvantaged in the areas of unemployment and contact with other health services particularly general practitioners. They had significantly lower scores on the GAF and had more unmet needs on the CAN, including numeracy and literacy skills. Both patient groups, however, reported problems with intimate relationships.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Service users attending voluntary sector services are likely to be more socially and materially deprived than their counterparts attending statutory services and specific strategies are required to assist these organisations in meeting the many needs of the service users.
|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When this is seen in the context of the high rates of psychotic illness reported for this group (Thomas et al, 1993 ; Bhugra et al, 1997), this problem takes on an even greater significance. In addition, the socio-economic resources of this group are relatively limited when compared with the rest of the British population - this is compounded by the experience of racism (Nazroo, 1997). One of the attempts to address this situation has been the establishment of voluntary sector organisations which have attempted to provide more culturally appropriate mental health support services. The Fanon Project was one of the first of these.
The Fanon Project was initiated in Lambeth after the recommendation of the Scarman Report (commissioned in the aftermath of the Brixton riots ; Scarman, 1981), by a group of social workers and community activists. It was designed to serve young Black men who were being seen on the streets of Brixton and were either known or suspected to have a mental illness (Moodley, 1987). Initially funded and set up by the Brixton Council, it was opened in March 1985 and was eventually named after the Martiniquan psychiatrist, Frantz Fanon, whose work dealt with the impact of racial identity on psychological distress in colonial societies.
The Brixton Community Day Centre (Shore Centre) is run by the South London and Maudsley Trust and therefore provides a natural geographical point of comparison with the Fanon Day Centre (FDC). The Shore Centre is fully integrated within the Trust's organisation and deals with patients referred from two Lambeth mental health teams. It provides a range of social, occupational and medical treatments and is located near to the centre of Brixton (as is the FDC).
Very little research has been conducted into the work that is done by the voluntary sector within mental health. This study sought to identify and characterise the service users who attended the Fanon project and compare them with those who attended a day centre operated by the mainstream psychiatric service in the same catchment area.
|
|
The study |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Demographic information on marital status, housing, employment and nationality were also obtained by interview. The subjects were then assessed for social functioning using the Global Assessment of Function (GAF) which is derived from the Global Assessment Scales for Symptoms and Disability (Endicott et al, 1976). A qualitative assessment of met and unmet needs at the time of interview was undertaken using the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) which has been shown to differentiate between staff and service user perceptions of needs (Slade et al, 1999). Care was taken to exclude those patients who attended both services.
Demographic characteristics were compared between patient groups using
2 tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance
(ANOVA) for continuous variables. For continuous outcomes, means and standard
deviations summarise the data in each group while for the categorical
variables, proportions of subjects in each group with the particular
characteristic are reported.
|
|
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Employment history
All of the FDC service users were currently unemployed (100%) while only
four were known to have been employed at some point in their lives (7.4%).
These figures compare with 80% unemployment rate in the statutory sample and a
lifetime employment rate of 30%.
Forensic history
FDC service users had significantly more forensic histories than their
Shore Centre counterparts (Table
1). Of the 41 (76%) service users from FDC who had positive
forensic histories, only five had been convicted or charged with violent
crimes such as grievous bodily harm or shooting. Only 13 (25%) of the
statutory service users had forensic histories.
Attendance
With regard to frequency of attendance, some of the FDC service users
attended every day (46%). Among the Shore Centre service users, 23% attended
up to three times per week. This was due to the nature of the schedules at the
respective centres. At the FDC service users can drop in at any time provided
the centre is open whereas the schedule is somewhat more structured at the
Shore Centre to coincide with specific group activities. For the FDC service
users, their main reason for attending was to escape what they described as
the system as represented by the police and the psychiatric services. At the
Shore Centre reasons for attending were mainly because of their doctor's
advice and for some activity to occupy their time.
Contact with services
Thirty-four FDC service users were in current and fairly regular contact
with the statutory services and had assigned care workers. Another 10 (18.5%)
attended other day centres or were known to social services. Two service users
visited their general practitioner (GP) for physical ailments and eight denied
any current contact with any statutory health or social service. Only 20 (37%)
were registered with GPs. This low level of registration with GPs among the
FDC service users is significant as 47 (91%) of the Shore Centre service users
were registered (Table 1).
Medication history
Forty-nine service users had been prescribed psychiatric medication at some
point in their lives, but only 23 claimed that they had ever taken any of the
medication (Table 2). All of
the statutory sample had been prescribed medication and 93% claimed to adhere
to their medication.
|
GAF
The FDC service users had significantly more severe impairment than those
attending the Shore Centre (Table
2).
CAN
The major unmet needs identified for the FDC service users were : (a) the
lack of numeracy and literacy skills ; (b) intimate relationships ; (c) use of
cocaine and alcohol ; and (d) dealing with psychotic symptoms and the
accompanying psychological distress. Daytime activities and problems with
intimate relationships were most expressed as unmet needs by the Shore Centre
service users (Table 2).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the FDC, the predominant cultural group is Jamaican and this group may have specific cultural needs which are catered for in the areas of food, social and recreational activities. There may be a need for culturally sensitive and specific services that can make these distinctions in practice. This preponderance may also reflect the census composition of the Caribbean population in Brixton (Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, 1991) but does suggest that in the establishment of these services, care must be taken to understand the needs of the people they are likely to serve.
The number of unmet needs particularly for the FDC service users underlines their level of social and material deprivation. Problems with the development of intimate relationships would appear to be common to both groups and the need for daytime activities is also present. This is an often forgotten consequence of having a chronic, stigmatising mental illness. In addition, the FDC group identified numeracy and literacy skills as being absent and needed, but this may be related to their experience in the school system in Britain or to the disruption of their education arising out of their migration to Britain in childhood. This may also have contributed to their low levels of employment. They are likely to be unemployable when these problems with literacy are seen in conjunction with their mental health problems and their contact with forensic services. Specific rehabilitation strategies are therefore necessary to address these problems.
Another feature which distinguished the FDC group was the distress occasioned by their psychotic symptoms. This is likely to have resulted from their relatively limited contact with the statutory services and a low rate of registration with GPs. It may also be related to their problems with the use of alcohol and cocaine. There may need to be a strengthening of the clinical relationship if this need is to be addressed.
The large number of FDC patients with forensic histories also suggests that this is an area that needs specific attention, particularly since the majority of patients had criminal records for relatively minor crimes. Again, closer links with the forensic and probation services may both serve to pick up cases earlier and to prevent further contact with these services.
The significant level of disadvantage being experienced by the FDC service users illustrates that the voluntary sector has an important role to play in the administration of mental health care to the community, as there will always be some groups who view the institutional services with distrust because of their own experience or that of other members in their community.
The group seen by voluntary services is likely to be much more disadvantaged and socially deprived than the corresponding statutory service and therefore parallels cannot be easily drawn between the two services, especially in the areas of funding and staff utilisation. These voluntary services require extensive support to cope with the difficult problems experienced by their service user group and collaborative efforts must be intensified to facilitate this.
|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BURNETT, R., MALLETT, R., BHUGRA, D., et al (1999) The first contact of patients with schizophrenia with psychiatric services : social factors and pathways to care in a multiethnic population. Psychological Medicine, 29, 475-483.[CrossRef][Medline]
ENDICOTT, J., SPITZER, R. L. & FLEISS, J. L. (1976) Global Assessment Scale : a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766-771.[Abstract]
FANON TRUST (1995) Fanon Annual Report. London : Fanon Management Committee.
HUTCHINSON, G. & GILVARRY, C. (1998) Ethnicity and dissatisfaction with mental health services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 95-96.
KOFFMAN, J., FULOP, N. J., PASHLEY, D., et al
(1997) Ethnicity and use of acute psychiatric beds : one-day
survey in North and South Thames Regions. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 171,
238-241.
LEAVEY, G., KING, M., COLE, E., et al (1997)
First-onset psychotic illness : patients' and relatives' satisfaction with
services. British Journal of Psychiatry,
170, 53-57.
MOODLEY, P. (1987) The Fanon Project. A day centre in Brixton. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 11, 417-418.
NAZROO, J. (1997) Ethnicity and Mental Health : Findings From a National Community Survey. London : Policy Studies Institute.
OFFICE OF POPULATION CENSUSES AND SURVEYS (1991) 1991 Census. Country Report : Inner London. London : HMSO.
PARKMAN, S., DAVIES, S., LEESE, M., et al
(1997) Ethnic differences in satisfaction with mental health
services among representative people with psychosis in South London : PRISM
Study 4. British Journal of Psychiatry,
171,
260-264.
SCARMAN, LORD (1981) The Brixton Disorders 10-12 April 1981 : Report of an Inquiry by the Right Honorable Lord Scarman OBE. CMND 8427. London : HMSO.
SLADE, M., PHELAN, M. & THORNICROFT, G. (1999) A comparison of needs assessed by staff and by an epidemiologically representative sample of patients with psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 28, 543-550.
THOMAS, C. S., STONE, K., OSBORN, M., et al
(1993) Psychiatric morbidity and compulsory admission among
UK-born Europeans, Afro-Caribbeans and Asians in Central Manchester.
British Journal of Psychiatry,
163, 91-99.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Jackson, H. W. Neighbors, M. Torres, L. A. Martin, D. R. Williams, and R. Baser Use of Mental Health Services and Subjective Satisfaction With Treatment Among Black Caribbean Immigrants: Results From the National Survey of American Life Am J Public Health, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 60 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |