Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 486-487. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.12.486-c
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 486-487
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Home treatment service
Andrew Sandor, Lecturer in Social and Community Psychiatry
Sir: I read with interest the study by Harrison et al (Psychiatric
Bulletin, August 2001, 25, 310-313) about which patients are
suitable for a home treatment service. The authors are right to comment that
little has been written about the type of patient suitable for this approach.
However, this question may be premature, in that there is little agreement
about what the approach actually involves. Their own particular
model is described as a hybrid between day hospital and home treatment, which
is rather an unusual configuration for home treatment services.
The authors write as if there is a strong evidence-based rationale for the
development of acute home treatment services. Despite their incorporation in
the National Service Framework for Mental Health, there is not. Their referral
to "key components of the model" is highly questionable. To borrow
from Burns (2000), how do they
know that any of these features are necessary or make a difference? The
so-called model has not been adequately defined. At present, the
terminology of crisis intervention, or home treatment as it is otherwise
known, is inadequate and confusing and prevents adequate conclusions being
formed. What is needed is a well-defined model with tightly defined components
followed by extensive testing of model fidelity. What the authors are
reporting on here is the characteristics of those who were selected for their
particular hybrid version of home treatment and day hospital, which limits the
external validity of the research.
References
BURNS, T. (2000) Psychiatric home treatment.
BMJ, 321,
177.[Free Full Text]