PB Mental Health Guidelines from NICE
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 195. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.5.195-a
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coates, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coates, J. W.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 195
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


correspondence

Urinary detection of olanzapine and its limitations

John W. Coates, MB MRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist

Mental Health Services, Rotherham General Hospital, Moorgate Road, Rotherham S60 2UD

Sir: Sander (Psychiatric Bulletin, January 2001, 25, 33) is correct in pointing out some of the limitations of urinary detection of olanzapine as a proxy for compliance, as previously described by myself (Coates, 1999, 2000). Currently, only a negative result shows non-compliance, whereas a positive result is open to various interpretations. I am presently studying two ways of potentially addressing these shortcomings, which may prove helpful.

First, I am investigating the quantification of the urinary levels of olanzapine, rather than just using a qualitative test. This should provide more of an indication of the actual compliance when levels are ascertained. Second, the measurement of urinary metabolites, either quantitatively or qualitatively, may lead to a more sophisticated approach in the future. In particular, 10-N-glucuronide is the most abundant metabolite but 4'-N-desmethy-lolanzapine is correlated to clearance (Callaghan et al, 1999) and this may give a better indication of a person's recent compliance.

Currently, however, non-detection of urinary olanzapine remains the best objective test of non-compliance and with these further developments it may prove to be even more valuable in clinical practice.

References

CALLAGHAN, J. T., BERGSTROM, R. F., PTAK, L. R., et al (1999) Olanzapine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 37, 177-193.[CrossRef][Medline]

COATES, J. W. (1999) Urinary detection of olanzapine — an aid to compliance. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 591-592.

COATES, J. W. (2000) Urinary detection of olanzapine — an aid to compliance confirmed. Psychiatric Bulletin, 24, 316.[Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coates, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coates, J. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals