|
|
|||||||||||
correspondence |
Mental Health Services, Rotherham General Hospital, Moorgate Road, Rotherham S60 2UD
Sir: Sander (Psychiatric Bulletin, January 2001, 25, 33) is correct in pointing out some of the limitations of urinary detection of olanzapine as a proxy for compliance, as previously described by myself (Coates, 1999, 2000). Currently, only a negative result shows non-compliance, whereas a positive result is open to various interpretations. I am presently studying two ways of potentially addressing these shortcomings, which may prove helpful.
First, I am investigating the quantification of the urinary levels of olanzapine, rather than just using a qualitative test. This should provide more of an indication of the actual compliance when levels are ascertained. Second, the measurement of urinary metabolites, either quantitatively or qualitatively, may lead to a more sophisticated approach in the future. In particular, 10-N-glucuronide is the most abundant metabolite but 4'-N-desmethy-lolanzapine is correlated to clearance (Callaghan et al, 1999) and this may give a better indication of a person's recent compliance.
Currently, however, non-detection of urinary olanzapine remains the best objective test of non-compliance and with these further developments it may prove to be even more valuable in clinical practice.
References
CALLAGHAN, J. T., BERGSTROM, R. F., PTAK, L. R., et al (1999) Olanzapine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 37, 177-193.[CrossRef][Medline]
COATES, J. W. (1999) Urinary detection of olanzapine an aid to compliance. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 591-592.
COATES, J. W. (2000) Urinary detection of olanzapine
an aid to compliance confirmed. Psychiatric
Bulletin, 24,
316.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |