PB Evidence-Based Mental Health
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 237. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.6.237-c
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gotz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Clafferty, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gotz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Clafferty, R.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 237
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

correspondence

Patient or client?

Michael Gotz, Consultant Psychiatrist and Robert Clafferty, Consultant Psychiatrist

Kildean Day Hospital, Drip Road, Stirling FK8 1RW

Sir: We were interested to read Ritchie et al's (Psychiatric Bulletin, December 2000, 24, 447-450) findings on what individuals in contact with psychiatric services wish to be called and we would like to add our own preliminary results from our ongoing project, which support their findings.

Out of 137 consecutive attenders at a general adult psychiatry clinic, 114 (83%) preferred to be described as a ‘patient’, 18 (13%) preferred to be described as a ‘client’ and the remainder express no preference, or preferred other terms.

These results provide further evidence to support the use of the traditional term ‘patient’ rather than politically correct alternatives. The Orwellian use of language may damage the speciality of psychiatry by marginalising it in the field of medicine and contributing to the stigma of mental illness. The majority of individuals who visit psychiatrists subjectively describe suffering (patire). Many individuals visiting cardiologists do not describe subjective suffering - they have no symptoms. Cardiologists are unlikely to address their patients as client - why should psychiatrists?




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
M. Acevedo, H. Bullen, M. Kehoe, and N. Walker
Journal clubs
Psychiatr. Bull., February 1, 2004; 28(2): 66 - 66.
[Full Text]

This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gotz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Clafferty, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gotz, M.
Right arrow Articles by Clafferty, R.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals