PB Handbook for Psychiatric Trainees
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 238. doi: 10.1192/pb.25.6.238-b
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nalpas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nalpas, A.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2001) 25: 238
© 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


correspondence

Changes in the practice of electroconvulsive therapy

Sara Smith, Specialist Registrar in General Psychiatry

Redditch

Agnes Nalpas, Consultant Psychiatrist responsible for ECT

Kidderminster Hospital

Sir: Having abandoned the use of electrolyte solution in favour of gel, our local monitoring and recording systems showed a marked increase in impedance. Despite adequate skin preparation and electrode placement and the use of greater mechanical pressure in the application of the electrodes, impedance levels remained higher by a factor of approximately times four compared to previous levels.

As impedance provides a measure of the resistance to current flow from the electrode to the patient, the change in method (and hence impedance) is likely to necessitate a significant increase in the current required for effective treatment (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1995).

In addition, increased side-effects may be a result. The two patients treated during the cross-over period complained of significantly more side-effects of headache, memory impairment and general feelings of ‘unwellness’ when the impedance levels rose.

For the time being, in the absence of better evidence, we have chosen to return to the use of pads and electrolyte solution for the comfort of our patients.

References

ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS (1995) ECT Handbook: The Second Report of the Royal College of Psychiatrists Special Committee on ECT. Council Report CR39. London Royal College of Psychiatrists.





This Article
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nalpas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nalpas, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals