|
|
|||||||||||
College Research Unit, 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW
White and Sherwin Solicitors, London
College Research Unit, London
Funded by the Department of Health as part of the National In-patient Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Study (NICAPS).
The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Royal College
of Psychiatrists. ![]()
|
|
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study aimed to examine in-patient child and adolescent consultant psychiatrists' knowledge of and attitude to the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA), the Children Act 1989 and issues around consent. A questionnaire form was sent to all in-patient consultants in England and Wales.
RESULTS
The consultants who responded (n=51, 67%) reported a desire for more training in legal issues. Knowledge of the MHA was better than for the Children Act 1989; those who used the MHA at least once every 6 months scored more correct answers to questions about the MHA than did those who used it less frequently or never.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Although the study indicates specific gaps in knowledge, the main message is that training should consider the legal framework as a whole, with an emphasis on practical issues about its application in the in-patient setting.
|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These findings suggest that some consultants would benefit from additional training about these issues. This paper reports a survey that we used to identify more precisely what these training needs are.
|
|
Method |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The questionnaire asked about the following:
As well as piloting the questionnaire with a small group of consultant psychiatrists, the questions relating to legal matters were scrutinised by a solicitor with specialist knowledge in the law relating to young people (R.W.).
|
|
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Training and activity related to legal aspects of mental health
care
Forty-one respondents (80%) were approved under Section 12 of the MHA.
However, two-thirds (n=27) of those who were approved only engaged in
the type of MHA work that required approval every 6 months or less frequently.
Twenty-four (47% of all consultants) had participated in an MHA review
tribunal in the past year; only one had ever acted as an MHA commissioner.
In terms of other law-related activity, 35 consultants (69%) had prepared at least one court report during the previous year and 20 (39%) had made at least one court appearance during the same period.
Thirty-two respondents (63%) reported having received one day's training, or less, in mental health law during the previous 2 years. Consistent with this, only 19 consultants (37%) rated themselves as being fully up-to-date with changes in the law that affected young people; a further 29 (57%) thought that they were partly up to date. Ninety per cent (n=46) rated their access to legal advice as adequate or better.
Attitudes to legislation and related issues
The consultants' responses to the attitudinal statements are shown in
Table 1. For some statements
there was a fairly even spread of responses, indicating a range of views; for
others, there was more concordance. The latter include a strong endorsement
for a multi-disciplinary approach to mental health care, the need for guidance
in clarifying when to use the MHA and when to use the Children Act 1989, the
need for more training about legal issues and the importance of child and
adolescent psychiatrists being approved under the MHA.
|
Knowledge about the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Children Act
1989
Tables 2 and
3 show the consultants'
responses to the questions about knowledge of the MHA and Children Act 1989,
respectively. The mean correct response rate for questions about the MHA was
2.7/4 (68%), with a standard deviation of 1.0. For the Children Act 1989, the
mean correct response rate was 4/9 (45%), with a standard deviation of 2.0.
The most striking difference was that a much higher proportion indicated that
they would have to look up the answers for questions relating to the Children
Act 1989 (a mean of 49% for each question), compared with those relating to
the MHA (9%).
|
|
Responses to the questions about consent are shown in Table 4. The mean correct response rate was 2.8/5 (77%), with a standard deviation of 0.9.
|
Relationship between use of the Mental Health Act 1983 and
knowledge
Those who used the MHA at least once every 6 months (n=21) scored
more correct responses to questions about the MHA than those who used it less
frequently or never: 3.1 (s.d.=0.9) v. 2.4 (s.d.=1.0)
(t-test: t=2.6, d.f.=49, P<0.05). The difference
remained significant when the consultants who were not approved under Section
12 of the MHA (n=10) were excluded.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite this, the results do suggest that there are significant deficits in the knowledge about legislation and legal issues concerning consent. This is acknowledged by the psychiatrists themselves, who are strongly in favour of more training. In particular, many consultants either do not understand or report uncertainty about key aspects of the Children Act 1989. It is likely that there is a cycle at play whereby lack of knowledge causes psychiatrists to favour the MHA over the Children Act 1989, and a lack of exposure to the Children Act 1989 increases unfamiliarity with it.
There are significant differences in knowledge between those who use the MHA relatively frequently compared with those who use it rarely or never. This might suggest that psychiatrists should either use the MHA frequently or not at all. Alternatively, training should be targeted particularly at those who use the MHA infrequently, to help them overcome deficits associated with lack of practice.
The survey highlights specific areas of strength and weakness in consultants' knowledge of the legal framework. However, perhaps the main conclusion is that training should consider the legal framework as a whole and practical issues about its application in child and adolescent mental health services.
|
|
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
O'HERLIHY, A., WORRALL, A., BANERJEE, S., et al (2001) National In-patient Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Study. London: Department of Health.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |