PB RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2003) 27: 464. doi: 10.1192/pb.27.12.464-a
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawley, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bestley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lawley, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bestley, J.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2003) 27: 464
© 2003 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

Multi-disciplinary team assessments

David Lawley, Consultant in Old Age Psychiatry and John Bestley, Consultant in Old Age Psychiatry

Hull and East Riding Community Health NHS Trust, Maister Lodge, Hauxwell Grove, Middlesex Road, Hull HU8 0RB

The article by Simpson and De Silva in the September issue (Psychiatric Bulletin, September 2003, 27, 346-348), outlining two team referral models of multidisciplinary teams (MDT) working in Old Age Psychiatry, was of interest to us, primarily as the debate echoed changes which have occurred within our own service within the past few years. However, we believe that we have moved the service one important step further.

Until August 2002, the Old Age Service in Eastern Hull, a socially deprived urban area, worked largely by the ‘Whitby model’ described in the article. However, despite this model, a large catchment population, high morbidity and referral rates (including many inappropriate ‘urgent’ referrals), demanding cover arrangements, and the relative clinical isolation resulting from working in scattered community settings, all contributed to sustained stress and low consultant job satisfaction.

In response, the service was remodelled to involve two consultant psychiatrists working closely together. Although one of the consultants takes the lead for a rural population, both have input into urban Eastern Hull and work as integrated members of the MDT. Each has an area of special interest across the whole patch - one consultant deals with hospital liaison, while the other leads the memory clinic and family therapy. Protected time is provided for CPD, personal and service development issues.

The incorporation of this arrangement into MDT working has, we believe, improved the depth and quality of discussion on clinical issues, cover is simple, and consultant job satisfaction has vastly improved. The MDT values the model and we believe that overall service quality has improved. Others may wish to consider similar service innovations.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawley, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bestley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lawley, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bestley, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals