PB RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Correction for Chaudhary, Psychiatr Bull 28 (2) 67.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 228. doi: 10.1192/pb.28.6.228-a
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Walker, N.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2004) 28: 228
© 2004 The Royal College of Psychiatrists


Correspondence

Not only examiners!

Nicholas Walker

Consultant Psychiatrist, Ravenscraig Hospital, Inverich Road, Greenock PA16 9HA.

Correspondence: E-mail: Nick.Walker{at}renver-pct.scot.nhs.uk

Dr Chaudhray (Psychiatric Bulletin, February 2004, 28, 67) is not alone in having a professional leave treated as study leave by his employer. However, the letter raises a far broader issue than membership examinations.

My employers treat all professional leave as study leave. Thus examining, sitting on appointment panels, attending College committees, giving time to advise the Scottish Executive Health Department and many other activities are considered study. Meanwhile, it is self-evident that such activities do little for my continuing professional development (CPD). As a consequence, neither time nor funding are available for genuine study leave (and my PDP does not include ‘a leisurely walk in Hyde Park’ among its peer group approved objectives!). This position sits paradoxically with NHS clinical governance, College, appraisal, revalidation and employment requirements to maintain good practice through CPD. In the families of schizophrenia sufferers, we try to address such double binds because of their negative prognostic implications.

As a College, can we intervene while the NHS prognosis might be amenable to improvement?




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
M. E. J. Wise
How to make job planning work
Psychiatr. Bull., October 1, 2005; 29(10): 385 - 386.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Melatonin Dosing
M Jan Wise
PB Online, 9 Jun 2004 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Walker, N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals