|
|
|||||||||||
Queen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Vincent Drive, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2QZ
Queen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital, Birmingham
Lyndon Clinic, Solihull
Queen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital, Birmingham
|
|
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To describe the experiences of psychiatric senior house officers (SHOs) of being on call. A survey of SHOs on three on-call rotas across south Birmingham was conducted to investigate their opinions about on-call work and to consider how time on call is spent.
RESULTS
SHOs in psychiatry gain a broad range of experience out of hours on a traditional on-call rota. On-call periods were valued as a learning experience and 63% of SHOs were confident in their decision-making while on call. However, on-call work was often viewed as isolating, and not all SHOs felt that they were working as part of a team when on call.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
As changes to working patterns are introduced, for example in order to implement the European Working Time Directive, care must be taken to retain the positive aspects of current on-call systems. Such changes should be seen as an opportunity to improve working lives so that SHOs feel less isolated when providing out-of-hours cover.
|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Senior house officer posts are training posts and there may be conflict between training SHOs and delivering service, with service-based training being proposed as the most viable solution. This is arguably most easily achievable during conventional working hours when the SHOs work can be overseen and workload manipulated by others on the team to ensure that training needs are being met. Although SHOs have been described as representing cheap labour to the National Health Service (NHS) and as being particularly valuable for out-of-hours emergency work (Harris & Ferreira, 1997), on-call work may offer a unique training opportunity.
The Royal College of Psychiatrists offers little guidance as to what experience psychiatric trainees should expect, and be expected, to gain on call. There is only one relevant sentence in the Colleges Basic Specialist Training Handbook stating: trainees must have experience in participating in a first on call rota with a minimum of 55 nights on call during the period of basic specialist training (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2003, para. 2.7). No advice is offered on what a first on-call rota should involve.
As of 1 August 2004 junior doctors in the NHS are no longer excluded from the provisions of the European Working Time Directive. This limits their working hours first to 58 hours a week, and by 2009 to 48 hours a week. This will inevitably lead to the introduction of shift working in place of more traditional on-call rotas and is likely to affect the training of SHOs.
We wanted to see what SHOs experiences of psychiatric on-call work were and what particular concerns trainees might have regarding being on call. We also wanted to directly ask SHOs for their thoughts on the proposed changes to on-call working patterns that will be introduced in order to implement the Working Time Directive.
|
|
Method |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The first questionnaire was in three parts. Respondents were asked to indicate how strongly they agreed with 15 statements about on-call working on a five-point Likert rating scale (Table 1). They were asked to give a yes/no response to two statements whether or not changing to a shift system would offer benefits to their personal life, and whether or not it would offer better training opportunities. They were also asked to give examples of tasks that they had been asked to do on-call that they considered to have been inappropriate, and were given the opportunity to make any other comments about on-call work.
|
The second questionnaire sought information about tasks during specific on-call periods. Respondents were asked to detail the number of assessments, admissions and risk assessments carried out and to provide brief details about these (Table 2). They were also asked about any management plans they had devised during the on-call period. Information was sought on whether SHOs discussed issues with, or sought advice from, senior medical staff or other colleagues during the on-call period and whether or not they would discuss any aspects of that on-call period during supervision.
|
Senior house officers covering three psychiatry on-call rotas across south Birmingham were invited to participate in the study. These were resident on-call SHOs, covering general practitioner referrals and the wards, and non-resident on-call SHOs, covering accident and emergency and liaison referrals, at a teaching hospital and SHOs on-call at a district general hospital. A brief outline of the study was presented to the SHOs at their respective academic meetings prior to the start of the study period. All SHOs were asked to complete the first questionnaire at the outset of the study. They were asked to complete a second questionnaire for each 24 h on-call period during the study period, which lasted 85 days. Questionnaires were left in the on-call rooms for resident on-call SHOs and in the doctors mess for non-resident on-call SHOs. Telephone prompts at the end of the on-call period were undertaken to remind SHOs to complete the questionnaires.
|
|
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Opinions
Senior house officers often felt that they were asked to undertake
inappropriate tasks when on call (Table
1). These tasks fell broadly into four categories: inappropriate
referrals (assessing drunk people in A&E); tasks that should
have been completed by others during conventional working hours; non-urgent
medical problems (5 years worth of knee pain needed review on
Bank Holiday Monday); and administrative tasks such as finding beds and
arranging patient transfers.
There were concerns about proposals to change working patterns from the traditional on-call system to a shift system. Seven trainees (29%) felt that changing to a shift system would offer benefits to their personal life; 15 (63%) did not. Seven trainees (29%) felt that shift working would offer better training opportunities; 16 (67%) did not.
Tasks
Table 2 outlines the tasks
undertaken by the SHOs during a 24 h on-call period. Advice was sought from
senior colleagues during 70 (34%) on-call periods. Respondents stated that
there were issues relating to 84 (41%) of the on-call periods that they would
discuss in supervision.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Trainees in all medical specialties have expressed concern about whether they can be satisfactorily trained under the European Working Time Directive (Pickersgill, 2001) with conflict between the intensity of work undertaken and gaining adequate experience. The shift systems, which will inevitably be introduced in order to implement the Directive, were viewed with suspicion by SHOs in this study, with only a minority considering that it would offer benefits to either their personal lives or their training. Comments were made that SHOs strongly feel that changing to partial shift will be detrimental to training and patient care and that change to a shift system is likely to have significant effects on personal life and also be disruptive to 9-5 duties.
There is no doubt that being on call on a traditional rota system, and in particular being sleep-deprived when working the following day, is also disruptive to 9-5 duties and to training and has implications for both staff and patient safety. Provision of a safe working environment has been an important factor driving the implementation of the Working Time Directive and should be welcomed, but in introducing changes, it will be important not to lose sight of those aspects of on-call duty that work well at present and are valued by trainees in offering important learning experiences. In particular, trainees were positive about the different types of experience that on-call work offered, and seemed confident about their abilities to make decisions. As might be expected the main tasks were assessments, in particular risk assessments, which the trainees were usually able to carry out without discussion with a senior.
In psychiatry SHOs are very much on the front line while on call and are working with seniors who are usually off-site, and it is recognised that acute on-call work can be very stressful (Guthrie et al, 1999). Educational supervision can minimise job stress (Guthrie et al, 1999) and the respondents to our survey recognised this and valued supervision. Perhaps unsurprisingly, many SHOs viewed on-call work as isolating. In this study trainees said that they knew whom to contact to seek advice and said that they were happy to contact seniors and discuss issues with the ward staff. However, there was a noticeable discrepancy between the number of management plans devised by, and risk assessments carried out by, SHOs and those discussed with senior colleagues or ward staff. This is concerning, as a risk assessment undertaken out of hours is meaningless and potentially dangerous if carried out in isolation. Some SHOs in our study said that they did not feel that they worked as part of a team when on call, but this might at least partly be because they did not avail themselves of the opportunity to liaise with medical and nursing colleagues, despite saying that they were happy to do so. Teamwork is viewed as essential in psychiatry, and it is important that as work patterns are about to change SHOs continue to have a role as members of the multi-disciplinary team around the clock. The challenge will be to ensure that SHOs feel less isolated when working on a shift system, not least by encouraging a collaborative approach with their nursing and senior medical colleagues, yet retain the current breadth of experience and responsibility that on-call work seems to provide.
|
|
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BROWN, J., DE COSSART, L. & WILTSHIRE, C. (2002) Exploring the views of basic surgical trainees (senior house officers) on a basic surgical training scheme. Medical Teaching, 24, 559 -561.[CrossRef]
GUTHRIE, E., TATTAN, T., WILLIAMS, E., et al
(1999) Sources of stress, psychological distress and burnout in
psychiatrists. Psychiatric Bulletin,
23, 207
-212.
HARRIS, E. & FERREIRA, P. (1997) Training senior
house officers. BMJ,
314, 692
-693.
HURLEY, P. A. & PATERSON-BROWN, S. (1999) Senior House Officer training: some myths exposed. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons Edinburgh, 44, 324 -327.
PAICE, E., WEST, G., COOPER, R., et al (1997)
Senior house officer training: is it getting better? A questionnaire survey.
BMJ, 314, 719
-720.
PICKERSGILL, T. (2001) The European working time directive for doctors in training. BMJ, 323, 1226.[CrossRef]
ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS (2002) Learning Objectives for SHOs. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.
ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS (2003) Basic Specialist Training Handbook. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. McLernon, F. Coccia, and A. G. Patel Adherence to the European Working Time Directive and its influence on clinical experience Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2007; 31(8): 295 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mason, T. Irani, G. Fountoulaki, S. Warwick, J. D. R. Davis, and P. Sudbury Psychiatry at night: experience of the senior house officer Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2006; 30(9): 329 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| British Journal of Psychiatry | Advances in Psychiatric Treatment | All RCPsych Journals |