PB RCPsych Publications
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 76. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.2.76
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiani, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bonell, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kiani, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bonell, E.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 76
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Correspondence

Assessment of capacity: a medico-legal challenge for decision makers

Reza Kiani, Senior House Officer in Psychiatry

Learning Disabilities Service, St George’s Hospital, Lincoln LN11FS, e-mail: reza.kiani{at}lpt.nhs.uk

Anayo Unachukwu, Senior House Officer in Psychiatry

St George’s Hospital, Lincoln

Enrique Bonell, Consultant in Psychiatry of Learning Disabilities

St George’s Hospital, Lincoln

Dr Jones, in her comprehensive article (Psychiatric Bulletin, November 2005, 29, 423–427), provides a review of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. The Act aims to provide a statutory framework to protect vulnerable people who may not be able to make their own decisions.

To ascertain current practice of local services as regards to assessment of capacity, we examined 60 randomly selected case notes of patients with learning disability in Lincoln (15 in-patients, 45 in the community; 42 males, mean age=41 years, s.d.=13, range 18-67).

Review of case notes revealed that patients needed to make a decision regarding their medication (36 patients), admission (15 patients), placement (6 patients), financial issues (2 patients) and a sexual relationship (1 patient). We found recorded evidence for assessment of capacity in 13 case notes (22%). Clinicians had allocated more than one appointment in two-thirds of cases and used alternative and augmentative communications (sign language, Makaton and picture books) in 33 cases (55%) to facilitate patients’ decision-making.

Our study also revealed the involvement of carers in a high proportion of cases (45, 75%) and reasonable consideration for patients’ wishes (24 cases, 40%) but little evidence of involvement of advocates (3 cases, 5%) and financial safeguard (2 cases, 3.3%).

The assessment of capacity and detailed documentation required by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 will be a challenge for busy clinicians. Failure to implement safeguards for those who lack capacity will not only jeopardise the quality of care provided but will also infringe on patients’ human rights and make decision makers vulnerable to lawsuits.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiani, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bonell, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kiani, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bonell, E.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals