Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 193. doi: 10.1192/pb.30.5.193-c
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Psychiatric Bulletin (2006) 30: 193
© 2006 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
The award of Membership without examination
Amit Malik, Chair
Collegiate Trainees Committee, The Royal College of Psychiatrists,
e-mail:
doctmalik{at}hotmail.com
I am writing to express the view of the Collegiate Trainees
Committee (CTC) on the issue of Membership without examination as discussed at
the last CTC meeting. Although acknowledging the importance of recognising
senior psychiatrists of international repute, trainees are opposed to the idea
of indiscriminate awarding of the MRCPsych to overseas psychiatrists if they
have not passed the UK examinations.
There are two lines of reasoning supporting this argument. First, there
seems to be a plethora of ways in many countries to obtain a postgraduate
psychiatric qualification, one of the eligibility criteria for the awared of
Membership without examination (Psychiatric Bulletin, January 2006,
30, 36). As some of these qualifications are not underpinned by
training, assessment and quality-assurance systems as robust as those in the
UK, awarding the reputable MRCPsych to holders of only these qualifications
would seriously devalue the MRCPsych in the eyes of not only the medical
community but also the public at large. Second, awarding the MRCPsych to those
who have not toiled through a very rigorous UK training and assessment system
would seriously discriminate against past, present and future generations of
postgraduate UK trainees who have done so.
If the College feels the need to recognise psychiatrists who have not
passed both parts of the Membership exam, it should ensure that there is some
way to differentiate their title from that of those who have undergone the
rigorous UK training.
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Awarding MRCP without examination
- RAJESH JACOB
- PB Online, 10 May 2006
[Full text]