PB Evidence-Based Mental Health
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Psychiatric Bulletin (2007) 31: 76-77. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.31.2.77
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, P.

Correspondence

Documentation of extrapyramidal symptoms

Sabyasachi Mitra, Consultant Psychiatrist

The Calcutta Medical Research Institute, West Bengal, India

Peter Haddad, Consultant Psychiatrist

Bolton, Salford and Trafford Mental Health NHS Trust, Salford, email: peterhaddad{at}doctors.org.uk

Kuruvilla et al (Psychiatric Bulletin, August 2006, 30, 300–303) reported that a high percentage of respondents in their survey had not received formal training in the assessment (52%) or management (36%) of drug-induced movement disorders and mean levels of confidence in these skills were relatively low. We studied the documentation of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in patients’ notes at a Manchester teaching hospital.

A psychiatrist (S.M.) conducted a standardised neurological examination on a representative group of 25 psychiatric in-patients and out-patients aged 18–65 years with schizophrenia and under several consultants. Extrapyramidal symptoms were rated on standard rating scales and parkinsonism, akathisia and tardive dyskinesia were diagnosed using predefined scores. Twelve of the 18 patients (67%) prescribed an atypical antipsychotic and 6 of the 7 patients (86%) prescribed a conventional antipsychotic fulfilled criteria for an extrapyramidal syndrome. A subsequent review of the clinical notes for the preceding 12 months showed that only half of the patients with an extra-pyramidal syndrome (9 of 18) had documented evidence of a management plan to treat the disorder and that only 1 of the 25 patients had a documented physical examination that recorded the presence or absence of extrapyramidal signs.

Our study indicates that EPS remain common in clinical practice despite the widespread use of atypical agents, that half of extrapyramidal syndromes are untreated and that screening for EPS is not routine. Possible explanations are that clinicians lack the knowledge, skills and confidence to assess and manage EPS or that they lack the time to address this aspect of care. We agree with Kuruvilla et al that clinicians need better education and training in this area.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, S.
Right arrow Articles by Haddad, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
British Journal of Psychiatry Advances in Psychiatric Treatment All RCPsych Journals