Psychiatric Bulletin (2007) 31: 110. doi: 10.1192/pb.31.3.110a
© 2007 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Do not resuscitate decisions need for objective measures
David Cornelius, Staff Grade in Old Age Psychiatry
Whitchurch Hospital, Park Road, Cardiff CF14 7XB, email:
davycorn{at}yahoo.com
Chakraborty & Creaney (Psychiatric Bulletin, October 2006,
30, 376378) described the understanding of do not
resuscitate (DNR) orders among staff in continuing care psychiatric
wards. Many nursing staff and many psychiatric trainees connect DNR orders not
only with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) but also with the intensity of
medical intervention for physical illness. Deterioration of physical health is
more common than cardiac arrest on old age continuing care psychiatric wards
and requires a decision on whether or not to transfer to a medical facility.
In the absence of clear guidelines, the role of DNR orders is debatable.
The argument for a DNR order is clear. In advanced dementia complicated by
physical debilitation, CPR is unlikely to be successful. If successful,
residual brain damage worsens the prognosis, contributing to an even poorer
quality of life. Such information is understood by relatives. However, reasons
given for not transferring to a medical ward appear vague and at worst
inhumane to relatives. A common explanation from a medical registrar on duty
is that further intervention is unlikely to improve quality of life. This is
viewed by many relatives as evidence of ageism in an era of scarce resources.
Indeed, transferring such patients may improve their quality of life by
relieving pain and discomfort caused by reversible conditions such as
pneumonia, septicaemia and bowel obstruction.
Perhaps the answer lies with clear and transparent guidelines supported by
objective means of measuring quality of life. Old age psychiatrists need
training in palliative care so that they can justify their treatment choices
in those with terminal illness.