<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org">
<title>Psychiatric Bulletin recent issues</title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org</link>
<description>Psychiatric Bulletin RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Psychiatric Bulletin</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0955-6036</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/ibc?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/321?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/327?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/336?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/341?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/345?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/353?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/356?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/357?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/357-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/357-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/358?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/358-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/358-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/359?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/359-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/360?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/360-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/ibc?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/295?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/298?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/307?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/309?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/312?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/313?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/316?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/316-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/316-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/317?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/317-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/317-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/319?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/320?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/320-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/245?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/250?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/253?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/256?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/262?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/265?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/268?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/274?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/274-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/274-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/275?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/275-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/275-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/276?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/276-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/276-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/277?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/277-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/278?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/279-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/280?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://pb.rcpsych.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Psychiatric Bulletin</title>
<url>http://pb.rcpsych.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/ibc?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[E-interview] Fernando Lolas]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/ibc?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fannon, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.022608</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[E-interview] Fernando Lolas]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage></prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ibc</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>E-interview</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/321?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Abortion and mental health]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/321?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p>A recent Royal College of Psychiatrists&rsquo; statement concluded that 
current evidence on abortion and mental health is inconclusive. This 
contribution examines the background to the Royal College of 
Psychiatrists&rsquo; statement and the issues it raises. It is concluded that 
the best route to resolving such issues is through further and better 
research.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fergusson, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Abortion and mental health]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>324</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>321</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/325?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Opinion & debate] Is psychiatry torn in different ethical directions?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/325?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p>Psychiatry is the only specialty that uses legislation which is torn 
between utilitarian and rights-focused approaches. Although on the one hand 
this improves the opportunity for good outcome, on the other it reduces 
autonomous decision-making. Because psychiatry is the only medical speciality 
in this situation, this may cause stigmatisation and an inappropriate 
expectation on psychiatry to fulfil some kind of social policing role.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lepping, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.019224</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Opinion & debate] Is psychiatry torn in different ethical directions?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>326</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>325</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Opinion &amp; debate</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/327?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] The repentant sinner: methods to reduce stigmatised attitudes towards mental illness]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/327?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To devise a simple technique to reduce stigmatised attitudes of the general 
public towards those with mental disorder (schizophrenia and substance 
misuse). Members of the general public (<I>n</I>=400) completed a 
questionnaire to measure stigmatised attitudes towards people with 
schizophrenia and substance misuse disorders. Participants were randomised to 
receive either a short, &lsquo;upbeat&rsquo; leaflet with a description of a 
patient in remission and a photograph of a man in a business suit; or a simple 
description of a fictional patient. The 5-item Attitudes to Mental Illness 
Questionnaire (AMIQ) was used to measure the effect of the various procedures 
on stigmatised attitudes (score range &ndash;10 to +10).</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Results were received for 310 (77%) participants. The leaflet produced a 
large, statistically significant reduction in stigmatised attitudes towards 
people with opiate dependence (effect size 1.53, CI 1.23-1.82, 
<I>P</I>&lt;0.0001; median change 4 units) and alcohol dependence (effect 
size 1.41, CI 1.12-1.70, <I>P</I>&lt;0.0001; median change 4 units) but less 
so towards people with schizophrenia (effect size 0.54, CI 0.27-0.80, 
<I>P</I>=0.0002; median change 2 units). There was no difference between 
participants in respect of the control group at 4-week follow-up (233 
responses received; 78% response rate).</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>A short illustrated leaflet can be used to reduce stigmatised attitudes 
towards substance misuse disorders if patients are presented in a positive 
manner. This is less effective for attitudes towards people with 
schizophrenia, possibly because people have a more generous attitude towards 
patients who have overcome substance misuse disorders.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luty, J., Rao, H., Arokiadass, S. M. R., Easow, J. M., Sarkhel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018457</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] The repentant sinner: methods to reduce stigmatised attitudes towards mental illness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>327</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] National service for adolescents and adults with severe obsessive-compulsive and body dysmorphic disorders]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>National guidelines for the assessment and treatment of 
obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and body dysmorphic disorder were 
published in 2005 by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 
(NICE). Local services are unable to treat a small but significant number of 
the most severely ill patients successfully, and the guidelines recommend that 
such patients should have access to highly specialised care. From 1 April 
2007, the Department of Health decided to centrally fund treatment services 
for severe, chronic, refractory OCD and BDD. We describe a new National 
Service for Refractory OCD; its rationale, treatments offered, referral 
criteria and expected clinical outcomes.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Initial results from one centre show an average 42% reduction in OCD 
symptoms at the end of treatment.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>The operational challenges and potential generalisability of this model of 
healthcare delivery are discussed. We present a summary of the progress made 
so far in establishing a new, coherent National Service for Refractory OCD, 18 
months after the NICE guideline was published. The aim of the paper is to 
educate clinicians about the service and describe its rationale, treatments 
offered, referral criteria and expected clinical outcomes.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drummond, L. M., Fineberg, N. A., Heyman, I., Kolb, P. J., Pillay, A., Rani, S., Salkovskis, P., Veale, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017517</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] National service for adolescents and adults with severe obsessive-compulsive and body dysmorphic disorders]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>336</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/336?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Community model in treating obsessive-compulsive and body dysmorphic disorders]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/336?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>In November 2005, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 
published guidelines for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) 
and body dysmorphic disorder. These guidelines incorporated a stepped care 
approach with different interventions advised throughout the patient pathway. 
South West London and St George&rsquo;s Mental Health NHS Trust devised a 
system of expert clinicians with special expertise in OCD/body dysmorphic 
disorder to help deliver this model of care. To aid the delivery of service it 
was decided to operationalise the definitions of severity of OCD/body 
dysmorphic disorder at each of the stepped-care levels. Examples are given as 
to how this has been applied in practice. Outcome is presented in terms of 
clinical hours in the first year of operation.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>In total, 108 patients were referred to the service in the first year. Many 
of these patients were treated by offering advice and support and joint 
working with the community mental health team and psychotherapy in primary 
care teams who had referred. Sixty-eight patients were treated by a member of 
the specialist service alone and 57 of these suffered from severe OCD. Outcome 
data from these 57 patients is presented using an intention-to-treat paradigm. 
They showed a clinically and statistically significant reduction in OCD 
symptoms after 24 weeks of cognitive-behavioural therapy comprising graded 
exposure and self-imposed response prevention. The mean Yale-Brown Obsessive 
Compulsive Scale score dropped from 28 (severe OCD) to 19 (considerable OCD). 
Depressive symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory also decreased by an 
average 24% over the same period.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>The feasibility of extending this model of service organisation to other 
areas and other diagnoses is discussed.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drummond, L. M., Pillay, A., Kolb, P. J., Benson, S., Fogg, R., Jones - Thomas, E., Rani, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017509</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Community model in treating obsessive-compulsive and body dysmorphic disorders]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>340</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>336</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/341?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Video self-observation: a means of improving insight in psychosis]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/341?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To improve the level of insight (measured using standardised instruments) 
using a video interview and self-observation. Changes in levels of insight 
were measured using the Schedule for Assessing Insight (SAI) at the time of 
admission, at the time of discharge (both prior to and following the viewing 
of the videotape) and at follow-up a few months later.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>The comparison of the SAI scores indicated a significant improvement in 
insight at the time of discharge (<I>P</I>&lt;0.005), with a further 
significant improvement after watching the video (<I>P</I>&lt;0.006). This 
appeared to be sustained at 3- to 6-month follow-up.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Video self-observation is a simple, inexpensive procedure that can be used 
to improve insight in psychosis. This study provides further support for the 
clinical utility of video self-observation in improving client&rsquo;s 
insight.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vikram, S., Yarger, N., Coxell, A., Maier, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.015966</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Video self-observation: a means of improving insight in psychosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>344</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>341</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/345?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Anti-stigma films and medical students' attitudes towards mental illness and psychiatry: randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/345?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To explore the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of the effects 
of two anti-stigma films on medical students&rsquo; attitudes to serious 
mental illness and psychiatry. Attitudes to serious mental illness, perceived 
dangerousness, social distance and psychiatry, were measured before and after 
watching the films and at 8 weeks.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Intervention films significantly improved general attitudes to serious 
mental illness and social distance, with a trend towards reducing perceived 
dangerousness. These effects appeared to attenuate during the students&rsquo; 
clinical placements, suggesting a possible interaction with their clinical 
experiences.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Our results suggest both that it may be possible to conduct a substantive 
trial of the effects of the intervention films on a larger cohort of medical 
students and that the films may be effective in reducing stigmatising 
attitudes in medical students.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerby, J., Calton, T., Dimambro, B., Flood, C., Glazebrook, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017152</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Anti-stigma films and medical students' attitudes towards mental illness and psychiatry: randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>349</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>345</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/350?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Part-time working in psychiatry in Northern Ireland]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/350?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To establish the proportion of psychiatrists in Northern Ireland who 
currently work part-time and the proportion of those working full-time who 
wish to work part-time. A postal questionnaire was forwarded to psychiatrists 
and repeated 30 months later.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>In 2004, only 18.3% of respondents were working part-time, and 26.8% in 
2006. A great majority stated their intent was to always work part-time, the 
most frequent reason being to achieve work-life balance.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>A significant number of staff working part-time will have implications for 
the staffing of the service. Policy makers must plan for the adequate 
provision of part-time working arrangements.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donnelly, C., McGarry, P., Mills, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017897</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Part-time working in psychiatry in Northern Ireland]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>352</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>350</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/353?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Education & training] Junior psychiatrists' electrocardiogram interpretation skills]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/353?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>We checked whether psychiatric junior doctors could identify common 
electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities. Participants were directly approached 
at three London sites during induction or teaching programmes.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>The survey had a total response rate of 65% (36/55). Psychiatry junior 
doctors displayed an overall success rate of 97% in detecting whether an ECG 
is grossly abnormal, but were much less competent in specifying exact ECG 
diagnoses (success rate of 41%). Accuracy rates for some diagnoses (e.g. paced 
rhythm) fell to as low as 11%. General practitioners performed no better than 
psychiatry trainees.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>There is little consensus about minimum acceptable standards in medical 
skills such as ECG reporting in junior doctors. These competencies are 
generally ignored in new curriculums. Questions regarding the appropriate 
remit of psychiatry doctors in this area are raised and the need for more 
monitoring and education of these skills is queried.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collins, N., Mandal, U., Pendlebury, G., Drife, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018960</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Education & training] Junior psychiatrists' electrocardiogram interpretation skills]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>355</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>353</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Education &amp; training</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/356?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Religion, psychiatry and professional boundaries]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/356?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poole, R., Higgo, R., Strong, G., Kennedy, G., Ruben, S., Barnes, R., Lepping, P., Mitchell, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.356</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Religion, psychiatry and professional boundaries]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>357</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>356</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/357?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] ]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/357?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hilton, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.357</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] ]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>357</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/357-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] ]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/357-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lepping, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.357a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] ]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>357</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/357-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] ]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/357-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carter, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.357b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] ]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>358</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>357</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/358?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Medication for side-effects under the Mental Health Act]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/358?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinton, M., Dudleston, K., Jefferys, P., Palia, S. S., Royston, C., Wood, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.358</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Medication for side-effects under the Mental Health Act]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>358</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>358</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/358-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Discharge delays]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/358-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tullett, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.358a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Discharge delays]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>358</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>358</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/358-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Depot risperidone, hyperprolactinaemia and prolactin-associated side-effects]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/358-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McIlhinney, S., Smith, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.358b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Depot risperidone, hyperprolactinaemia and prolactin-associated side-effects]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>359</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>358</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/359?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] 'I wish to speak to a psychiatrist, please': psychiatric vocabulary in phrase books]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/359?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suibhne, S. M., Chorcora, A. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.359</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] 'I wish to speak to a psychiatrist, please': psychiatric vocabulary in phrase books]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>359</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/359-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Attitude to workplace-based assessment]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/359-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pathan, T., Salter, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.359a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Attitude to workplace-based assessment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>359</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/360?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Reviews] Drug Misuse and Dependence: UK Guidelines on Clinical Management]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/360?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ajayi, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021287</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Reviews] Drug Misuse and Dependence: UK Guidelines on Clinical Management]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>360</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>360</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/360-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correction] Correction for Volume 32, p. 259]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/9/360-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.9.360-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correction] Correction for Volume 32, p. 259]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>360</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>360</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/ibc?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[E-interview] Peter Hoare]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/ibc?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fannon, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.022020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[E-interview] Peter Hoare]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage></prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>ibc</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>E-interview</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Renewing psychiatry's contract with society]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhugra, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.020560</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Renewing psychiatry's contract with society]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>283</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/284?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Opinion & debate] Relationships between residents in secure psychiatric units: are safety and sensitivity really incompatible?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/284?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dein, K., Williams, P. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.106.011478</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Opinion & debate] Relationships between residents in secure psychiatric units: are safety and sensitivity really incompatible?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>287</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Opinion &amp; debate</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Neuropsychiatry in the UK: national survey of existing service provision]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To elucidate and describe current neuropsychiatry service provision in the 
UK. A questionnaire was developed and posted to members of the Royal College 
of Psychiatrists who had expressed an interest in neuropsychiatry. The 
responses were tabulated and analysed using descriptive statistics and SPSS 
version 11.0 for Windows. The neuropsychiatry services provided, sources of 
referrals, setting of the services and funding streams are described.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Out of 251 respondents, 70 reported providing a neuropsychiatry service, 21 
having been principally appointed as neuropsychiatrists.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Neuropsychiatry services in the UK are currently based in a few regional 
centres, representing a patchy and inadequate service provision.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agrawal, N., Fleminger, S., Ring, H., Deb, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018424</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Neuropsychiatry in the UK: national survey of existing service provision]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>291</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Competence of psychiatric clinicians in interpreting electrocardiograms and QT intervals: can they do this? Does it matter?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>We assessed the abilities of trainee and consultant psychiatrists in 
reading and interpreting electrocardiograms (ECGs) and QT intervals using a 
questionnaire and standardised ECG.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Only 5% of our sample of trainee and consultant psychiatrists could 
correctly indicate a QTc interval. Performances on other measures, such as 
rate were also poor, with senior house officers performing better than 
consultants.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>The increased awareness of problems caused by antipsychotics has not been 
reflected in improved knowledge of ECGs among psychiatrists. Machines do not 
reliably calculate QT intervals. We therefore urge better training and 
understanding of ECGs for psychiatrists.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Solomons, L., Treloar, A., Noronha, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017715</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Competence of psychiatric clinicians in interpreting electrocardiograms and QT intervals: can they do this? Does it matter?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>294</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/295?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Providing a liaison psychiatry service in the absence of a consultant liaison psychiatrist]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/295?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>Liaison psychiatry services in Ireland are currently unequally distributed. 
In the absence of a specialist liaison psychiatry team, general adult 
psychiatrists may provide a consultation service to their local hospital. 
Demographic and clinical characteristics pertaining to all psychiatric 
consultations at the Louth County Hospital were collected over 12 months to 
examine one such local service and to highlight the challenges of this mode of 
service delivery.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>A total of 232 consults were audited. The most frequent reasons for 
referral were assessment following deliberate self-harm (38%), affective 
symptoms (28%) and alcohol or substance misuse (25%). This differs from 
documented referral patterns to specialist liaison teams. Referring physicians 
had a low diagnostic &lsquo;hit-rate&rsquo; with respect to affective 
disorders. Difficulties in service provision included poor communication by 
referring teams and time constraints due to other sectoral commitments.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Refinements to service delivery may be beneficial in managing the work-load 
more effectively. Priority should be placed on fostering communication with 
non-psychiatric colleagues.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flahavan, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.015925</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Providing a liaison psychiatry service in the absence of a consultant liaison psychiatrist]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>298</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>295</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/298?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Nurse-led liaison psychiatry service for older adults: service evaluation]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/298?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To comprehensively describe a nurseled consultation liaison service for 
older adults by retrospectively reviewing all referrals received in 2006 and 
comparing them against other services and benchmark reports.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Of the 298 individuals referred to psychiatric services from other hospital 
wards, 120 were aged 85&ndash;94 years old (40%), 193 were male (65%) and 152 
were referred from geriatrics (51%). A majority of 204 have not had previous 
contact with psychiatric services (69%). The most common diagnosis was 
dementia (33%, <I>n</I>=88), with 27% individuals (<I>n</I>=65) being 
referred onwards to secondary care.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>This nurse-led service, using a novel approach of a support worker 
providing further community support, functions well compared with traditional 
consultation models. It helps identify many individuals with dementia and 
engages them into community psychiatric services.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderson, D., Cattell, H., Bentley, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.016725</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Nurse-led liaison psychiatry service for older adults: service evaluation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>302</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>298</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Special articles] Neuropsychiatry in the UK: planning the service provision for the 21st century]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agrawal, N., Fleminger, S., Ring, H., Deb, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018432</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Special articles] Neuropsychiatry in the UK: planning the service provision for the 21st century]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>306</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/307?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Special articles] Oxford serious incident review: 7 years on]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/307?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rose, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Special articles] Oxford serious incident review: 7 years on]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>309</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/309?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Special articles] Help is at hand for people bereaved by suicide and other traumatic death]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/309?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hawton, K., Simkin, S., Rees, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018242</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Special articles] Help is at hand for people bereaved by suicide and other traumatic death]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>309</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/312?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Education & training] Bringing psychiatry training to the next generation: a Foundation Year 1 doctor's tale]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/312?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas, G., Knapp, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017913</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Education & training] Bringing psychiatry training to the next generation: a Foundation Year 1 doctor's tale]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>313</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Education &amp; training</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/313?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Education & training] What is it about dynamic psychotherapy?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/313?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dracass, S. E., Tracey, T., Bhui, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018945</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Education & training] What is it about dynamic psychotherapy?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>315</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>313</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Education &amp; training</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/316?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Learning disabilities and the new Mental Health Act]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/316?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Picton, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.8.316</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Learning disabilities and the new Mental Health Act]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>316</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/316-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Risk management in the digital age]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/316-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baker, P., Venan, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.8.316a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Risk management in the digital age]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>316</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/316-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Schizophrenia and gender identity disorder]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/316-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zafar, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.8.316b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Schizophrenia and gender identity disorder]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>316</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/317?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[The College] Rethinking risk to others in mental health services: final report of a scoping group]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/317?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021998</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[The College] Rethinking risk to others in mental health services: final report of a scoping group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>The College</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/317-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[The College] Psychological therapies in psychiatry and primary care]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/317-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.022004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[The College] Psychological therapies in psychiatry and primary care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>The College</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/317-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[The College] Postgraduate training in psychiatry: essential information for trainees and trainers]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/317-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.022012</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[The College] Postgraduate training in psychiatry: essential information for trainees and trainers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>317</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>317</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>The College</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/318?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] Silvio Benaim: Formerly Consultant Psychiatrist at the Royal Free  Hospital, London]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/318?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021980</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] Silvio Benaim: Formerly Consultant Psychiatrist at the Royal Free  Hospital, London]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Obituaries</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/319?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] Brian Lake: Formerly Consultant Psychotherapist, Leeds]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/319?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mindham, R. H. S., Sims, A. C. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021618</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] Brian Lake: Formerly Consultant Psychotherapist, Leeds]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>319</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>319</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Obituaries</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/320?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Reviews] Setting Up New Services in the NHS: Just Add Water (Community, Culture and Change)]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/320?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLean, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018549</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Reviews] Setting Up New Services in the NHS: Just Add Water (Community, Culture and Change)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/320-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Miscellany] International Narcotics Control Board elects Hamid Ghodse as President]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/8/320-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.022053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Miscellany] International Narcotics Control Board elects Hamid Ghodse as President]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>320</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>320</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Miscellany</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/241?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Capital punishment for children's services: a new legal policy?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/241?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jones, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018879</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Capital punishment for children's services: a new legal policy?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>244</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/245?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Drug Interventions Programme: clinical profile of service users v. attendees of standard services]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/245?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>We conducted a retrospective survey of all cases referred to the Drug 
Interventions Programme in Hertfordshire for the first 9 months in order to 
compare them with those referred to one of the community drug and alcohol 
teams.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>The Drugs Interventions Programme had significantly more White British 
clients and clients who had dropped out from previous treatment. Compared with 
community team clients, the Programme had a higher percentage of clients with 
an opioid problem (92%), of whom a high percentage also misused other 
substances (78%) and injected drugs (30%, half of whom shared needles).</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>More chaotic clients who had failed previous treatment have entered 
treatment with the Drug Interventions Programme.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kouimtsidis, C., Edwards, J., Wallis, C., Drabble, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Drug Interventions Programme: clinical profile of service users v. attendees of standard services]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>245</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/248?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Routine measurement of mental health service outcomes: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in Nova Scotia]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/248?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>Although the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) were designed for 
routine clinical use, completion rates in clinical settings rarely exceed 60%. 
We evaluated two initiatives to increase completion rates: timely feedback to 
clinicians, useful at individual, team and service levels, and improved 
supporting materials (tabulated glossaries for all versions covering the 
lifespan).</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Clinicians in South Shore Health district provided ratings on all 
out-patient referrals over 12 months as part of routine care. Data were 
captured using the Nova Scotia routine administrative data system. Completion 
rates rose from 61% to 86% (<I>n</I>=1190). Clinicians&rsquo; ratings of the 
instrument&rsquo;s ease of use were significantly improved.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Use of a tabulated glossary and enhanced feedback of clinically useful 
information improved clinician support for the routine measurement of health 
outcomes with HoNOS.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kisely, S., Campbell, L. A., Robertson, H., Crossman, D., Martin, K., Campbell, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017756</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Routine measurement of mental health service outcomes: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in Nova Scotia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>250</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/250?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Pitfalls and potential dangers in the referral process to a specialist brain injury unit]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/250?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHODS</b></p>
 
<p>We looked retrospectively at referrals over 1 year and determined the 
length of time from receipt of the referral to the date when authorisation to 
see the patient was given, and the time from authorisation to first contact. 
For in-patients we determined the time from the recommendation for admission 
to the time authorisation was granted, and the time from authorisation to 
admission.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Of the 108 referrals, 80 (74%) were seen within 13 weeks (mean=53 days); 7 
patients (6%) had to wait over 13 weeks, usually because of delays in 
authorisation; 10 patients were admitted; 14 were never admitted (although we 
had recommended admission). The time from recommendation to admit to 
authorisation of admission, 27 days, was the same as the time they waited for 
a bed once authorisation had been given.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Waiting for authorisation seemed in some patients to delay their access to 
tertiary services. Any advantage of using panels to authorise referrals, like 
ensuring better use of local resources, may be outweighed by patients taking 
longer to get the care that best meets their needs.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuruvatti, J., Fleminger, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017293</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Pitfalls and potential dangers in the referral process to a specialist brain injury unit]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>252</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/253?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Police and sniffer dogs in psychiatric settings]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/253?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To study the views of staff and patients on the use of sniffer dogs to 
detect illicit drugs and the prosecution of in-patients suspected of taking 
illicit drugs. A 15-item self-report questionnaire was given to all 
in-patients and staff who had any contact with patients in a medium-secure 
unit. Responses to the individual statements were measured on a five-point 
Likert scale and staff and patients&rsquo; responses were compared.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>We achieved a response rate of 63% (patient response rate, 71.6%; staff 
response rate, 60.7%). Overall there were fewer differences than anticipated, 
although, as expected, staff viewed the impact of illicit drugs more 
negatively than patients, and on the other hand, patients viewed the use of 
sniffer dogs and police involvement more negatively than the staff did.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Notice ought to be taken of the discordance between staff and 
patients&rsquo; views (particularly in relation to consent and 
confidentiality) when attempting to detect and manage illicit drug use among 
psychiatric in-patients.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khalifa, N., Gibbon, S., Duggan, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017483</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Police and sniffer dogs in psychiatric settings]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>253</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/256?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Safety at work: national survey of psychiatrists in basic training in Ireland]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/256?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHODS</b></p>
 
<p>To investigate the experiences of Irish psychiatric trainees in relation to 
safety at work and the related training issues. A questionnaire was posted to 
243 psychiatric trainees throughout Ireland.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>We obtained 113 responses (46.5%). Results indicated that tutors appear to 
consider safety at work as an important component of training. The 
availability of breakaway or similar training is much bigger than previously 
reported in Ireland. The standard of induction courses appears to be high. 
However, problems in working environments were revealed: 16% of trainees had 
been physically assaulted and 72% have felt threatened in the workplace.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>Despite improvements in training in Ireland, workplaces remain largely 
unsafe, putting staff and patients at risk.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rush, G., Reidy, J., Wright, B., Campbell, F., Ryan, M., Molyneux, G., Ambikapathy, A., Leonard, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018267</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Safety at work: national survey of psychiatrists in basic training in Ireland]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>258</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>256</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/259?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Does a business-like letter written for a general practitioner meet the standards for patients?]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/259?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To gauge the acceptability of copying a business-like clinic letter for 
general practitioners, written by a doctor working in the Newbury Community 
Mental Health Team for Older Adults. Between August 2004 and March 2006 every 
letter written by each doctor was stored electronically. The letters contained 
a clear statement of the diagnosis, the active problems and a bullet-point 
care plan. Any concerns or reactions to the letters were documented as they 
were received. Between September and October 2006, 50 service user or carer 
recipients of the letters were sent a questionnaire, checking whether the 
letter met standards of clarity, helpfulness and content.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Over 20 months 427 service users and carers received a total of 731 
letters. One carer asked for the letter not to be sent in future; four carers 
asked for details of the letter to be modified; in only one was the content of 
the letter to the general practitioner modified before it was sent to the 
service user. The questionnaire about the suitability of the clinic letter had 
a 90% reply rate and all respondents said the letters were clear, 
understandable and that their content was of no surprise to them.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>This report of a successful use of a frank business-like letter copied to 
service users or carers should be understood in the context of the following 
factors: the doctor who wrote them was familiar with and confident about the 
clinical work and comfortable with the style of the letter; he had a good 
rapport with a generally well-educated population and positive support from 
his colleagues. With these factors in place, the direct style of the letter 
was well received by patients and carers.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mason, J., Rice, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.017806</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Does a business-like letter written for a general practitioner meet the standards for patients?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/262?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Valproate as prophylaxis for clozapine-induced seizures: survey of practice]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/262?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>To evaluate the prescribing of valproate in clozapine-treated individuals 
who may be at risk of seizure. We collected point-prevalent clinical 
characteristics and demographics of all in-patients prescribed clozapine in an 
acute mental health trust. Data were collected from case notes, electronic 
records and drug charts, and analysed against a set audit standard.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>Data were collected for 81 in-patients. Of all deemed to be at risk of 
seizure (<I>n</I>=37) only 24% were prescribed valproate at a therapeutic 
plasma level.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>The majority of patients prescribed clozapine at risk of seizures were not 
adequately protected from this risk. Clear guidelines are required.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sparshatt, A., Whiskey, E., Taylor, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.019174</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Valproate as prophylaxis for clozapine-induced seizures: survey of practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>262</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/265?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Referral patterns and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor prescribing for cognitive impairment (1999-2007): impact of NICE guidelines]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/265?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>We hypothesised that the proportion of people referred to two outer London 
mental healthcare services for older people with cognitive impairment 
increased after the 2001 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 
(NICE) guidelines for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor use in 
Alzheimer&rsquo;s disease, but declined after the amended 2006 guidelines. We 
reviewed case notes for 546 individuals referred between 1999 and 2007.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>The proportion of individuals with cognitive impairment referred increased 
between 1999 (56.1%) and 2005 (70.5%, <sup>2</sup>=5.4, <I>P</I>=0.02), 
as did the proportion prescribed AChE inhibitor (0.8% to 16.1%, 
<sup>2</sup>=27.5, <I>P</I>&lt;0.001). There were no significant 
changes between 2005 and 2007.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>The 2006 NICE amendment may have curbed the increase in psychiatric 
referrals and AChE inhibitor prescribing rates for people with cognitive 
impairment but so far these rates have not decreased.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ganeshalingam, Y., Cooper, C., Livingston, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018143</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Referral patterns and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor prescribing for cognitive impairment (1999-2007): impact of NICE guidelines]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>267</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/268?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Crisis resolution and home treatment teams for older people with mental illness]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/268?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ 
<p><b>AIMS AND METHOD</b></p>
 
<p>We examined the impact of a crisis resolution and home treatment teams 
(CRHTT) on hospital admission rates, bed days and treatment satisfaction among 
older people with mental illness and their carers. We compared these factors 
in the 6 months before the service started and 6 months after its 
introduction.</p>
 
<p><b>RESULTS</b></p>
 
<p>The CRHTT significantly reduced admissions (<I>P</I>&lt;0.001), but there 
was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay as compared 
before and after the introduction of this service. There was a trend towards 
carers, but not patients, being more satisfied with treatment after the 
introduction of the CRHTT.</p>
 
<p><b>CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS</b></p>
 
<p>The CRHTT reduced hospital admissions for older people by 31% and carers 
preferred the service. Further research on crisis teams in older people with 
mental illness is needed using randomised controlled methodology.</p>
 
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dibben, C., Saeed, H., Stagias, K., Khandaker, G. M., Rubinsztein, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018218</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original papers] Crisis resolution and home treatment teams for older people with mental illness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>270</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>268</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/271?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Education & training] Is CEX good for psychiatry? An evaluation of workplace-based assessment]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/271?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Searle, G. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.016576</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Education & training] Is CEX good for psychiatry? An evaluation of workplace-based assessment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>273</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>271</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Education &amp; training</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/274?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Recruitment and selection into specialty training]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/274?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abuzeid, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.7.274</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Recruitment and selection into specialty training]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>274</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>274</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/274-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Pain and self-harm]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/274-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theodoulou, M., Bass, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.7.274a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Pain and self-harm]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>274</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>274</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/274-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Supplementary prescribing by nurses]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/274-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomar, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.7.274b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Supplementary prescribing by nurses]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>274</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>274</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/275?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] ]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/275?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hussain, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.7.275</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] ]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/275-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Making the most out of the Gold Guide]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/275-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thangavelu, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.7.275a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Making the most out of the Gold Guide]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/275-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Recruiting psychiatrists - the Singapore experience]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/275-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broekman, B. F. P., Kumar, R., Toh, A. Y. P., Heok, K. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.7.275b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Recruiting psychiatrists - the Singapore experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>275</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/276?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Montelukast and worsening of hallucinations in paranoid schizophrenia]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/276?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anandan, N., Ibitoye, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.7.276</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Montelukast and worsening of hallucinations in paranoid schizophrenia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>276</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/276-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Questioning and answering exams]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/276-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Badrakalimuthu, V. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.7.276a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Questioning and answering exams]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>276</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/276-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Power and glory]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/276-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moliver, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.32.7.276b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Correspondence] Power and glory]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>276</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>276</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/277?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[The College] Results for the election of the Dean 2008]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/277?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021592</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[The College] Results for the election of the Dean 2008]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>277</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>The College</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/277-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] James Bernard Walsh]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/277-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Egan, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021097</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] James Bernard Walsh]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>277</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>277</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Obituaries</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/278?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] John Gwilym Howells]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/278?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freeman, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021626</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Obituaries] John Gwilym Howells]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>278</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Obituaries</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Reviews] Clinician's Quick Guide to Interpersonal Psychotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nightingale, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.107.016394</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Reviews] Clinician's Quick Guide to Interpersonal Psychotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/279-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Miscellany] Writing the College's history]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/279-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bewley, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021642</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Miscellany] Writing the College's history]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Miscellany</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/280?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[E-interview] Moosajee Bhamjee]]></title>
<link>http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/short/32/7/280?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fannon, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1192/pb.bp.108.021600</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[E-interview] Moosajee Bhamjee]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Royal College of Psychiatrists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>32</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>280</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>E-interview</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>